Given a conditional p → q, its inverse is ¬p → ¬q. A conditional and its inverse are NOT in general logically equivalent; assuming the inverse is the 'denying the antecedent' fallacy. The inverse is however equivalent to the converse.
Inverse of a conditional
Related concepts
- Material implication
- Logical negation (NOT)
- Cherenkov angle: cos(θ_C) = 1/(β·n)
- Seebach-Corey umpolung framework: a1 (natural electrophile) ↔ d1 (dithiane nucleophile) polarity flip
- δ-notation framework: δ = (R_sample/R_std − 1)·1000 ‰ (parts-per-mille isotope-ratio deviation)
- Sphere surface-to-volume ratio A/V = 3/R
- Prime editing